Censorship or regulating Speech is never the answer. (Quick Thoughts)

I wrote a while back about Political Venom, how the political scene is so polarized honest debate has been left behind, and the common tactics is insults to the opposing view instead of a debate on the merits of an issue.

Now there is a move to re-institute the Fairness Doctrine among other calls in some form to regulate speech some consider as “hate” or incite full”. This is NOT THE ANSWER to the problem. I am not sure what is the answer, other than stopping the insults and lets talk about the issue, but limiting speech is limiting ideas and debate where it exists.

The only way any sort of regulation can be achieved with force is by the Government, the First Amendment was designed specifically to prevent this, to NOT LET GOVERNMENT decide what can and cannot be said. If government is given the power to censor or limit speech it finds offensive, obscene, hateful, incite full or by other prescribed method, government has been given a mechanism to limit or prevent speech which may not be in its interest and prevent it in one of those names. This gives a means to prevent or limit the strongest dissent of government, which in contrary to the Constitution, American spirit and the American Founding, which were all based on the Strongest dissent of Government.

Limiting or censoring speech can only have one certain consequence, the exchange of ideas and debate will be limited, and limited debate cannot lead to the possibility of the best answers to the questions the Nation faces.

Compare and Contrast; The Articles of Confederation vs. The Constitution

The Articles of Confederation contained many flaws, some serious that if not corrected may have been fatal to the United States (Why the Articles of Confederation Failed). Upon the drafting of a new Constitution in 1787, the drafters took many of these lessons and short comings to heart, and corrected them in the new Constitution. Originally when the first Convention was called for in Annapolis in 1786, the intention was to simply alter and amend the Articles of Confederation. The poor showing in Annapolis in September 1786, with only New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware and Virginia sending representatives, led this convention to only recommend another convention in Ma, 1787. This Convention that was recommended  for May 1787, to take place in Philadelphia, this became the Convention that drafted a new Constitution.

Just as had been tasked for the Annapolis Convention in 1786, the Convention in Philadelphia was similarly tasked by the Congress assembled to make recommendations to Alter and Amend the Articles of Confederation. This convention quickly realized that just altering or amending the Articles of Confederation would not suffice, and a whole new Constitution was written. The Articles of Confederation served as the base idea for the Convention, and many parts or influences of the Articles can be seen in the Constitution, but it is the differences that set the Constitution apart.

Who are the Founding Fathers? Robert Yates

A member of the New York Delegation to the Constitution convention of 1787, Robert Yates left the Convention early, never to return and sign the Constitution. Rather he would become one of the main opponents to the Constitution under the pseudonym Brutus of the Anti-federalists, whom collectively succeeded in having a Bill of Rights ratified. The son of Joseph and Maria Yates, Robert Yates was born in Schenectady, NY, on January 27, 1738. He received a classical education in New York City and later studied law with William Livingston and also became a surveyor. In 1760 Robert yates was admitted to the New York bar, and moved to Albany where in 1765 he married Jannetje Van Ness and eventually having six children.

Early on in the the struggle for American liberties he as a leader of the Albany's Patriots. Even though he did not sign the Albany Sons of Liberty constitution of 1766, he did become prominent in the Albany opposition to the Stamp Act. Between 1771 and 1775 Yates was a member of the Albany board of aldermen. Pre-Revolution he considered himself a Whig, whose vigilance against corruption and emphasis on the protection of liberty appealed to many in the all  Thirteen Colonies. By 1774, he had joined the Albany Committee of Correspondence and stood among its first members when the committee's activities became public in 1775. During this time he remained a member of the Albany common council, even though it purpose was being replaced by the extra-legal Committee of Correspondence, Safety, and Protection.

Why the Articles of Confederation failed.

The first attempt for the United States at a Constitution was the Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation first came up for discussion on June 12, 1776¹. Knowing the inevitability that Independence would soon be a reality, a committee was formed to discuss and draft a Constitution for all the United States. It would not be until November 15, 1777² that they would be approved by the Congress, and not until March 1, 1781³ that they were finally ratified by all 13 States. Just a few days over eight years later, the Articles of Confederation would be part of history, being replaced by the Constitution on March 4, 1789⁴.

So why did the Articles of Confederation fail? Why did this first attempt at government not succeed? What in the Articles was wrong, or insufficient, or cumbersome that needed to be corrected? There were many reason the Articles of Confederation failed, many things happened in the United States and the government that exposed significant flaws. Perhaps you are one of the many that have heard it was because the Articles were not strong enough, that is part of the reason, but not the only reason. What the Articles of Confederation where is discussed here (The Articles of Confederation explained; What are they?).

The major problems of the Articles of confederation that will be addressed here are:

• Each State had One Vote in Congress.
• Nine States required to pass most Legislation
• Congress could not regulate Trade
• The United States could not raise its own revenue 
• The Congress could not enforce its laws
• The Government of the United States was a Single body
• The Congress could not suppress insurrection or rebellion, or protect the Nation from foreign threat.
• Amendments required a Unanimous Vote

The Articles of Confederation explained; What are they?

On July 2, 1776 the Second Continental Congress first voted to declare independence from the United Kingdom¹. Two days later, the final draft of the Declaration of Independence was accepted², and the United States of America was born. It was not until March 4, 1789³ that the current Constitution of the United States took effect, so what governed the United States from 1776-1789? For the most part, but for a very short time in 1776-1777⁴, it was the first Constitution of the United States, the Articles of Confederation Though shorter than the present Constitution (~3,400 words to ~4,500 words), the Articles of Confederation bridged the time from Independence and War to our current Federal Republic.

 

Even before the Congress voted to declare Independence from Great Britain in 1776, the fact it would happen was not much in doubt, it was only a matter of when. With a committee having been formed to draft up a Declaration of Independence on June 11, 1776⁵, the inevitability of self-government required action. The following day on June 12 a committee was also formed to, "prepare and digest the form of a confederation to be entered into between these colonies"⁶. This Committee consisted of (sic)